Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 13,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
United States, the Florida Times-Union reports on the decision’s broader implications for the sentencing of so-called armed career criminals. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:11 pm
§§ 921(a)(33)(A) and 922(g)(9) are unconstitutional under the Second, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 3:02 pm
Chantiles v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:32 am
Hansen In Sierra Forest Legacy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
" Plaintiffs are the franchise representatives throughout the State of California. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
Section 1341 before the United States District Court for the Central District of California in the criminal action entitled U. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:30 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy discusses Thaler v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
United States and Maxwell v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
And California state courts have never read the statute as having such an implied exemption. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Sierra Chemical defended its action on the basis that Vicente Salas had originally obtained his job by using a false Social Security number to establish his eligibility to work in the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
The Federal Circuit reversed and held that fraud could only be proven through clear and convincing evidence of an intent to deceive the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and reinstated Bose’s registration. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
Rudnick v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: State Compensation Insurance Fund v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Paracetamol is the name used outside of the United States for acetaminophen. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
Supreme Court, January 21, 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:33 am
It did so on the basis of its allegation that the listing mechanism violated the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
United StatesDocket: 10-341Issue(s): (1) Whether the Federal Circuit erred by creating a defense to breach of the implied contractual duties under the sovereign acts doctrine that is at odds with the two-part test established by this Court in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:11 pm
That means that it's possible Perry v. [read post]
