Search for: "U.S. v. Hope*" Results 9141 - 9160 of 9,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 9:23 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Similarly, the public interest does not favor Parler: The Court explicitly rejects any suggestion that the balance of equities or the public interest favors obligating AWS to host the kind of abusive, violent content at issue in this case, particularly in light of the recent riots at the U.S. [read post]
It does not delineate a boundary on the issues on which the public may submit comments…The Commission invites comment on all potential rules, including those currently in force in foreign jurisdictions, individual U.S. states, and other legal jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
On January 29, 2013, the Division of Federal Employees’ Compensation (“DFEC”) published FECA Bulletin No. 13-01. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:17 am by Erik J. Heels
v=4K5fbQ1-zps Some took 16 steps forward, some took zero, I took four (but not for the stuff in parentheses). [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
  As Reynolds explains, the forclosure legislation "deal" reached in the U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
” Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told reporters that the key assistance the U.S. would like from Turkey would be permission to use Turkish air base Incirlik and an agreement to help arm and train moderate Syrian forces. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
The drop in overall deal volume over the first two quarters did not change the character of the investors, with 84% of buyers being strategic, and domestic U.S. buyers accounting for 90% of transactions, consistent with the preceding few years [9]. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
His successor, James Clapper, said in 2011 that while terrorism “will remain at the forefront of our national security threats,” al-Qaeda “continues to be damaged” by U.S. counterterrorism efforts. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:28 pm by Orrin Hatch
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:51 am by Keith Lee
In the matter of Paper v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am by Kelly Buchanan
I wonder how many people in the U.S. have, like me, watched some of the Cricket World Cup matches. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Orrin Hatch
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
The drop in overall deal volume over the first two quarters did not change the character of the investors, with 84% of buyers being strategic, and domestic U.S. buyers accounting for 90% of transactions, consistent with the preceding few years [9]. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am by Geoffrey Manne
 The whole thing is worth reading, but here’s a snippet: As the Supreme Court explained in Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
We discussed these articles and issues in our recently-filed amicus brief before the U.S. [read post]