Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 14,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
United States, Colorado officials have no duty to enforce the federal law--unless they volunteer to do so, either on their own or in exchange for federal dollars. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 pm
NORTHERN IRELAND LAW QUARTERLY THE VALUE OF EVIDENCE IN LAW Peter Tillers Vol. 39 No. 2 Summer 1988 THE VALUE OF EVIDENCE IN LAW* … [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:34 am
Among those assets was Urban, an Illinois limited partnership which owned high-end retail shopping centers all over the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:34 am
Among those assets was Urban, an Illinois limited partnership which owned high-end retail shopping centers all over the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
Maynard and was later implicitly accepted by some justices of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
On November 19, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considered a case that is at the heart of the cultural struggle over entitlements for religious organizations: Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm
Message from the president of the United States, transmitting, in response to Senate resolution of February 11, 1889, a report upon the case of Louis Riel. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
In United States of America v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), an opinion issued earlier this month by the D.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), an opinion issued earlier this month by the D.C. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:56 am
Stanley's residence is one unit in an apartment complex comprised of six units. . . . [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:30 pm
N.J.S.A. 9:17-43(b), 48(d).In D.W. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
As I noted in “Confusion Over Causation in Texas” (Aug. 27, 2011), the Texas Supreme Court managed to confuse general and specific causation concepts in its decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am
It distinguished Navani v. [read post]
Estrada v. Salas-Perez, 2012 WL 4503147 (N.D.Ill.) [Mexico][Habitual Residence] [Grave Risk of Harm]
20 Nov 2012, 8:20 am
In Estrada v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Hostess Brands' problems provide anecdotal support for the above data on right-to-work versus closed shop states. [read post]
