Search for: "Young v. Young"
Results 9141 - 9160
of 12,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:06 pm
There has been a meme floating around the net of late concerning the so-called Rakofsky v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:35 am
Galleries, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
After pleading guilty to that offence, he was sentenced to a term of 18 months imprisonment in a Young Offenders Institution and the suspended sentence of 10 weeks was activated. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Fahy presented oral argument in the 1st internment case to reach the Supreme Court, Hirabayashi v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:01 am
Young, the plaintiff had alleged breach of his employment contract. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:00 pm
Salem v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
Best Interest of Child Outweighed Application of Exclusionary Rule in Custody Case In Matter of Young v Young, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2010 WL 6622106 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the Appellate Division affirmed an order which awarded the father sole custody of the parties child. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:00 am
ARB’s director of communications, Stanley Young, says that ARB is filing an appeal of the ruling this morning. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:33 am
Chief Justice Young issued a concurring opinion suggesting reasons why minimum employer contribution requirements might not be reasonable. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
No such right is mentioned expressly in the Constitution, but the Supreme Court has recognized this right since the 1920s, and so far only Justice Scalia has argued that no such right exists (though Justice Thomas has expressly said that he expresses no view on whether it exists).And in Parham v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:57 am
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The problem here, though, is that the Supreme Court in Miami Herald v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:44 pm
” Earlier this week, in State v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:12 pm
" No matter how much we might question Facebook's policies, the lesson from Young v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The latest contribution to the Second Circuit’s reversal docket is a 400-page sentencing opinion from earlier this week, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:22 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:08 am
Today, in State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:35 am
Just yesterday, I blogged about Young v. [read post]
