Search for: "High v State"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 35,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
The High Court rejected the appeal stating that there was no implied term for restitution after the limitation period but the Court of Appeal allowed their appeal on the basis that there was an implied term in which they could recover the costs if they could show that it had not been due on the merits, and that this attracted a six-year limitation period running from the date of Aspect’s payment. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:21 am
In People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:22 am
State Rep. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
The Court also has an unusually high number of cases regarding the processes by which the federal courts operate. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm
Caresse Navigation Ltd v Zurich Assurances Maroc & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 1366 A cargo of coal was carried by the Respondent Owners from Rotterdam to Nador (Morocco). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 1:46 pm
Last year's Supreme Court ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 9:00 am
Sager, et al., v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:57 am
Yes, the high court ruled today in Wilson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
In Diamond v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
[We blogged on the Calcutta High Court judgment in Three-N Products v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Tomblinson] Alone among states, California requires a “mandatory mediation and conciliation process” for agricultural employers. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm
” More details on the Anthem data breach case discussed earlier here, and Ted Frank’s role in calling it into question [Bob Dorigo Jones] Also, for those with access, Ted has written a piece for the Wall Street Journal on the need to rein in abuse of the cy pres doctrine in disbursing lawsuit proceeds, with a suitable vehicle on the horizon: A bipartisan coalition of 16 state attorneys general is also urging the Supreme Court to hear Frank v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:17 pm
I'll look at the numbers over the weekend to try to get a good handle on what has happened thus far this term.In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 2:15 pm
Also on Tuesday, ACCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:27 am
Ciaramella, Reason] “Iowa Will Pay Poker Players Robbed by Forfeiture-Hungry State Cops” [Jacob Sullum] Time for the great U.K. child abuse witch hunt to close up shop [Charles Moore, Telegraph] “Reining in Prosecutorial Overreach with Meaningful Mens Rea Requirements” [Trevor Burrus on Cato amicus in 11th Circuit case of U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:34 am
The case is Mayfair House Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 11:50 am
Recent developments have upended many of our earlier predictions of the likely post-election immigration landscape in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, No. 12‐2688 (7th Cir. [read post]
