Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 12,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
United States.) [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
I taught Bowsher v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:57 am
Yet the CJEU had not the chance to take position on such question, since the forum derogatum was in the previous cases a non EU member-state, where the principle of mutual trust does not apply. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Back in January, in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
In that prosecution, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had initially refused registration because other financial institutions had already registered loyalt [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
On October 13, a new battle over post-conviction DNA testing begins as the Supreme Court hears arguments in Skinner v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
A member of that majority perhaps felt that a state should at least get a full chance to defend one of its laws before it was struck down. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
For a very similar example, consider United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
” And even as far back as Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:26 am
Indeed, the Letter clearly states the aims of a negotiation--a performance that will lead to a pre-negotiated result (probably the reason why some recoil at the theatre of the absurd that negotiation has morphed into): "Die bereits von Präsident Selenskyi ins Gespräch gebrachten Angebote an Moskau ‒ mögliche Neutralität, Einigung über die Anerkennung der Krim und Referenden über den zukünftigen Status der Donbass-Republiken ‒ bieten… [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
 In fact, a few years back in Poindexter v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm
Non-Significance Although avoiding the transposition fallacy, Griffis falls into another mistake in interpreting tests of significance; he states that a non-significant result tells us that an hypothesis is “perfectly consistent with mere chance”! [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Any one voter has a trivially small chance of altering an election, but any household can choose a new state and local government by simply moving. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
[4] See, e.g., Panova-Bohannan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 3:36 pm
In the case of Gincley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:25 am
I have no doubt that, between her and McCain that Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Any one voter has a trivially small chance of altering an election, but any household can choose a new state and local government by simply moving. [read post]
