Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 9161 - 9180 of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted Apple an extension until July 15 for its final brief, which in formal terms is only supposed to reinforce Apple's appeal of Epic's consolation prize from the district court (an injunction under California Unfair Competition Law) but which Apple will try to use in order to make some final points even on the more important issues in the case.There are two reasons for which Epic lost… [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Michael Kans
California and Vermont have enacted laws requiring the registration of data brokers operating in those states, and legislation has been proposed in Congress to do the same. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 10:51 am
Southern California Edison Company, 227 F.3d 1361, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:41 am by Amy Howe
That low bar is “easily passed” here, the government says. [read post]
On June 29, 2021, the District Court issued an Order, granting summary judgment, barring the FTC from recalculating and modifying how it would seek damages, if initially, it had sought monetary relief under Section 13(b). [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
Federal and state courts have recently issued noteworthy decisions yielding important lessons about directors and officers liability insurance policies. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:15 am
The court rejected the state's argument that the doctrine of parens patriae exempts the AG from meeting some state insurance code prerequisites. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:10 am
Bar Still Wants Insurance Disclosure Rule The Recorder After California Bar leaders announced last year that they might require lawyers to tell clients if they don't carry malpractice insurance, complaints began pouring in from attorneys concerned that clients would be more apt to sue, or that the resulting costs would drive them out of business. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
MySpace Inc., 175 Cal.App.4th 561, 96 Cal.Rptr.3d 148 (California Court of Appeals 2009). [read post]
An obvious exception is when a court orders the disclosure of the information. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
In De Canas, the State's program reflected Congress' intention to bar from employment all aliens except those possessing a grant of permission to work in this country. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm by John Ross
He's sued in state court, removes to federal, is remanded, and tries to appeal. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am by Betsy McKenzie
And the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Nolo, 2010.Capital PunishmentKFT565.C2 T46 2010Tennessee's new abolitionists : the fight to end the death penalty in the volunteer state / edited by Amy L. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Joel R. Brandes
In the fall of 2008, Brian had an internship position that required him to temporarily reside in California. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:37 am by Dan Bressler
” “Law Firm Can’t Represent Ex-DLA Piper Atty In Cannabis Row” — “A California state appeals court on Tuesday upheld the disqualification of an attorney who used emails his client provided him in a tort dispute over a cannabis company, finding that the emails were improperly acquired since they were protected by spousal privilege. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:31 am by Jim Sedor
Federal: Barring Reporters from Briefings: Does it cross a legal line? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
"   Challenge to diploma privilege revived "A federal appeals court has rekindled a challenge to a Wisconsin rule that allows graduates of the state's two law schools to become licensed attorneys without taking the state bar examination. [read post]