Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 9161 - 9180
of 9,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, the rate has steadily increased over the last twenty years. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Its decisions in Griggs v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm
Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:25 pm
Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:04 pm
” Buckles v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
., et al v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 8:04 pm
” Buckles v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
An employer does not meet its burden of proving misconduct connected with the employee's work by simply showing the employee was discharged for violating a rule, policy, or order. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am
United States, 515 U.S. 177 (1995). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm
See United States v. [read post]
