Search for: "11-7 Recording Corp."
Results 901 - 920
of 1,302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
The PTO merely inquires into whether “the public would recognize and understand the mark as identifying a particular living individual” and whether the record contains the famous person’s consent to register the mark.[10] Accordingly, section 1052(c) is unconstitutionally overbroad because it burdens speech that the right of publicity would not burden. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 10:07 am
Disclosing prior art to the Patent office places that information in the public record. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
Transfer of data outside the EU in connection with a discovery exercise is subject to the implementation of one of the appropriate safeguards defined in Article 46 of the GDPR, including standard data protection clauses, binding corporate rules, or the Privacy Shield framework.[6] Counsel must also ensure that any data collected and processed in connection with a discovery exercise in the EU is adequate, relevant and strictly limited to what is necessary, and that sufficient protections are in place… [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
Although technically part of the public record, this material is extremely hard to access, even for scientific researchers. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
See Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §11 (1998). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
("TSI") (D.I. 9); Objecting Noteholders ("Noteholders") (D.I. 11); GSS Data Services, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
¶ 7. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
General Court Rules Article 10, § 2 of the 1963 Constitution requires that “compensation shall be determined in proceedings in the court of record. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
Not only is there a record 28 active Canadian securities class actions currently being considered by Canadian courts, but these class actions are estimated to represent approximately $15.9 billion in claims.[5] This rise can be partly attributed to the perception that Canada has very similar securities class action legislation as the U.S. and therefore plaintiffs routinely launch parallel claims in Canadian jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Xerox Corp., 718 P.2d 929 (Alaska 1986), the court was “persuaded by the comments to the Restatement (Second) of Torts §500, which define reckless disregard of safety. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Although the notice of motion referenced a certification of counsel, the record does not include one. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
§ 271(a) (emphases added); Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Holding Corp. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
Beyond Impeachment, a Push for Ethics Laws That Do Not Depend on Shame New York Times – Elizabeth Williamson | Published: 1/11/2021 House Democrats are pressing ahead with an effort to try to ensure President Trump’s record of violating democratic and constitutional norms cannot be repeated. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Chevron Corp. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Similarly, asbestos plaintiffs’ expert witness, Barry Castleman, who had written a trial manual for plaintiffs’ lawyers based upon distorted assessment of individual companies’ historical involvement with asbestos, spends no time investigating the huge record of United States governmental knowledge of asbestos use.[11] Castleman, schooled by the lawsuit industry lawyers, understood that documenting the knowledge of the intermediary, product purchaser, and… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
