Search for: "Commonwealth of PA" Results 901 - 920 of 1,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Marshall v City of Philadelphia, 2014 WL 3579694 (PA 7/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1673382.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:19 am by Patricia Salkin
This case was brought to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on remand from a Supreme Court “mandate” directing it to consider the constitutionality of certain provisions of Act 13. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:50 am by Steven Chadwick
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014, the Pennsylvania State Senate passed the Commonwealth’s fiscal code by a margin of 26 to 22. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins is a partner and civil litigator with the Scranton, Pa., law firm of Foley Comerford & Cummins. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:58 am by By Amit Shah
The Case in Question On November 28, 2009, Walter Wetzel, night manager at Parkway Service Station in Pittsburgh, Pa., was robbed at gunpoint. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In one of the latest decisions handed down in the Commonwealth in the context of insurance bad faith litigation, Judge Jeffrey Sprecher of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas has doled out an $18 million dollar award against Nationwide Mutual Insurance along with an award of $3 million in attorney's fees in the case of Berg v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
LEXIS 205 (Pa Jan. 21, 2014), in which the highest court in our Commonwealth dazedly smiled at a design defect attack against FDA-approved prescription drugs. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Wolf, (MD PA, June 18, 2014), the federal district court rejected the motion to intervene. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" In the case of Commonwealth v Yastrop, 564 Pa 338, 768 A2d 318 [2001], the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that "substantial compliance with guidelines established in two earlier precedents of Pennsylvania's highest criminal court is all that is necessary to minimize the intrusiveness of a roadblock seizure to a constitutionally acceptable level. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:10 am by Patricia Salkin
Servants Oasis v Zoning Hearing Board of South Annville Township, 2014 WL 2756553 (PA Cmmwlth 6/18/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-commonwealth-court/1670191.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Upon appeal to the Commonwealth Court of PA, the WCAB was reversed and the granting of the Claim Petition by the WCJ was reinstated. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:30 am by Patricia Salkin
The Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, 2014 WL 2756551 (PA Cmmwlth 6/18/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-commonwealth-court/1670189.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]