Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 901 - 920 of 14,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew A. Gluth
Supreme Court’s decision three years ago in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
This concept was described in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, [2013] 1 AC 236 (“Rubin”) as the “administration of multinational insolvencies by a leading court applying a single bankruptcy law”. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Securities and Exchange Commission 16-906 Issues: (1) Whether Congress authorized federal district court jurisdiction over appointments clause challenges to Securities and Exchange Commission administrative law judges; and (2) whether SEC ALJs are inferior officers within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:40 pm
SEC to consider whether administrative law judges (ALJs) in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are 'Officers of the United States.'" [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Here, said the court, there was conflicting medical evidence and "it was for the administrative agency to choose between the conflicting opinions, and the courts are not free to reject the choice made by the administrative agency where room for choice exists. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:25 am by James Edwards
Supreme Court will this Friday, December 2, consider whether to grant certiorari in the case of Centripetal Networks Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:25 am by James Edwards
Supreme Court will this Friday, December 2, consider whether to grant certiorari in the case of Centripetal Networks Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:25 am by James Edwards
Supreme Court will this Friday, December 2, consider whether to grant certiorari in the case of Centripetal Networks Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:25 am by James Edwards
Supreme Court will this Friday, December 2, consider whether to grant certiorari in the case of Centripetal Networks Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:15 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Rather, said the court, the hearing officer's determination was based on Officer’s inconsistent statements in that his testimony at the hearing differed from statements he gave during an investigative interview and the hearing officer's credibility findings are entitled to deference.As to the issue of the hearing officer considering hearsay evidence, the Appellate Division pointed out that “an administrative tribunal can… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:15 pm by Scott McBride
As it did in Oil States (S.C. 2018), inertia appears to have played a role in the Supreme Court’s decision in the United States v. [read post]