Search for: "DEAN V. STATE" Results 901 - 920 of 2,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 12:41 pm by Alan Meese
  Pre-1937, aspiring lawyers could have invoked the sort of liberty of occupation protected in decisions such as New State Ice Company v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:41 pm by Alan Meese
  Pre-1937, aspiring lawyers could have invoked the sort of liberty of occupation protected in decisions such as New State Ice Company v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
  The latter happened last week in State v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Dean Paul Mahoney, the current dean at Virginia, recently posted a reply to my testimony. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm by Frank Cranmer
 As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]