Search for: "DOES 1-9" Results 901 - 920 of 27,580
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 7:33 am by Allan Blutstein
I saw three FOIA requests get denied in full:1. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
The Majority Leader is referring to Article 1, § 5, Clauses 1-2 of the Constitution of the United States, which read: Section 5. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am by familoo
The fact that the parties cannot agree at the outset does not of itself justify the grant or continuation of public funding. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:00 am
Question #9 – Employment Based Immigration Can I file for a Green Card on my own or does my employer have to sponsor me? [read post]
1 May 2011, 5:00 pm by Paul Stuart Haberman
Otherwise, when the 0, 1, or 2 goes, they will increasingly be at the mercy of the whims of those in charge of handling their professional careers. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
On November 27, 2023, the examiner issued a decision rejecting the requested trade mark under Article 7(1)(e)(iii) and Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the EUTMR essentially on the basis that:a) the mark is simply a combination of presentation features, with an upper view shape and a realistic flat lower surface with feathers, eyes, and beams, which consumers would perceive as typical of the products in question; b) the shape does not significantly… [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 3:31 am by Sander van Rijnswou
[emphasis in original] In this respect, the Enlarged Board subscribes to the principle expressed in decision R 8/15 (cited in decisions R 16/14, R 1/16, R 7/16, R 9/17, R 2/18 and R 3/18) whose catchword 1, in the pertinent part, reads as follows:[...] [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:23 am
Garcia (1/9/07) where the Ninth Circuit held that circumstantial and uncontroverted evidence proved that actual blurring has occurred, such that the district court properly granted summary judgment on Horphag's trademark dilution claims. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, the knowledge of the method and the conditions for determining the parameter is required for the parameter to be unambiguously defined (see T 412/02 [5.8-9]). [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am by Jessica Kroeze
According to this Board, the interpretation of those decisions ignores the fact that Article 114(2) EPC does not justify such discretion, as previous case law has repeatedly stated. [read post]