Search for: "ELI LILLY & CO."
Results 901 - 920
of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2017, 10:41 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 736 F.Supp.2d 219, 222-23 (D.D.C. 2010); White v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am
See Eli Lilly, 251 F.3d at 962. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:34 pm
Eli Lilly, the court reaffirmed that written description is determined based on the state of the art as of a patent’s priority date and that evidence which illuminates the state of the art only subsequent to the priority date is not relevant to written description. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
April 11, 2002); Lillie v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
See Accomac Realty Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 420 A.2d 1305, 1320 (N.J. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
BASF Co., et al., Case No. 11-cv-0513-UNA (D. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:33 am
" Vendo Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:07 am
BASF Co., et al., Case No. 11-cv-0513-UNA (D. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Some papers had reported that ligand PD-L2 binding generated a co-stimulatory signal whereas others reported PD-L1 was doing this. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65; Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC v Eli Lilly… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
breaks new ground: (Rouse & Co International), Stopping China online content theft: (China Law Blog),Taking depositions in China: (Part 1 - Experience Not Logic), (Part 2 - Experience Not Logic), (Part 3 - Experience Not Logic).IP re-education a Sisyphean task: (China Hearsay),Patent challenge in China: What's the state of the art? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:36 am
” AstraZeneca Decision, at pp. 12-13 (quoting Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
To the contrary, in Paper ConvertingMachine Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 536 F. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:09 pm
See E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
