Search for: "English v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 6,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State,272 Ga. 540 (1) (533 SE2d 60) (2000); State of Ga. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
Kokesh v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:03 am
Plain English Issue: Does the government violate a federal contract employee’s constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility? [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
This part of the inquiry is not about a public debate on, for example, state intervention, natural remedies, or whether there should even be community standards. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:30 am
In plain English, the Supreme Court passed. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm
The English Court of Appeal recently issued its judgment in PulseOn Oy v Garmin (Europe) Limited [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
2 May 2010, 11:47 am
British Columbia law is based on the 1870 English decision in Banks v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The defendant will claim the onus is on the plaintiff, who lives in the United States, filed a claim in the United States and intends to testify, presumably in English or through her own translator, at the eventual trial. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:46 am
Further, UoI stated that for the English courts to assume jurisdiction, the place of arbitration was a relevant factor. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm
United States: In plain English and with plain logic, Justice Jackson explains why Korematsu's encampment was unconstitutional and dangerous.4. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Michel V. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:44 am
The policy stated that "7. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 1:32 am
There is a short English phrase – not suitable for print – but featuring the word “cake” that sums this principle up nicely. [1] When reading this point, the authors were reminded of the decision of Vos J in Fresenius v Carefusion [2011] EWHC 2969 in which it was held that if a patentee consented to the revocation of its patent, it was not appropriate for it to be compelled to… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
Oregon can never be one of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
