Search for: "Harper v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 11:19 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:30 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Harper & Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:30 pm
The fact that this type of loan is even legal can be traced to a United States Supreme Court case, Marquette National Bank v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
" Harper v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:06 pm
(See Harper’s excellent article on the history of the tax advantaged Google operation Keyword: Evil.) [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Mandatory minimum -- Armed Career Criminal Act -- Predicate convictions -- Prior felony possession of short-barreled shotgun was not violent felony under ACCA -- District court properly declined to sentence defendant under ACCAUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:48 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:15 am
As Kevin Baker argued in the June 2006 issue of Harper's, key figures in the present Bush administration are linked to efforts to argue that the failure of the United States in Vietnam during the Nixon and Ford Administrations is attributable to a "sell out" by forces in the United States which opposed the war; Baker cites several other uses of this line of argument in American politics in the end of World War II and during the Korean War. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
Harper and Riggins v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 8:23 am
Now comes MPAO v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:30 pm
That includes home bakers like IJ client Cindy Harper, who was excited about the prospect of selling her delicious sugar cookies to friends in Lincoln. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Watch for the decision in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:41 pm
She had a strategic plan, modeled on how Thurgood Marshall went after racial discrimination leading to Brown v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:46 am
American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
