Search for: "IN RE MARK K" Results 901 - 920 of 1,420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2012, 8:23 am by Lovechilde
In most schools outside of K Street, that’s an answer that would get a failing grade and we’d start calling subsidies by another name. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:10 am by lawmrh
Such a deal – - – giving credence to the wisdom that when you’re traipsing in low places, it’s good to have friends in high places. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:53 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Generation in Transition - bit.ly/H2JTaV (Craig Ball) Another Indemnity Costs Order for eDisclosure Failures - bit.ly/H6Ns27 (Chris Dale) Burden of Proving Alteration of Email Evidence — Best Evidence Issues under Fed.R.Evid. 1008 - bit.ly/H6sFM4 (Gregory Joseph) Computer Forensic Advances Raise Complex Issues – bit.ly/HkGOC9 (Stephen Treglia) Da Silva Moore Plaintiffs File Reply… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm by Mark Bennett
I wonder if David knows that you're using his name to hawk whatever it is you're hawking ("affiliate wealth system"—a/k/a MLM pyramid scheme—perhaps?). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
"The Emerging System of International Arbitration": Teresa Cheng (right) (Des Voeux Chambers, Hong Kong) and Anthea Roberts (Harvard); IntLawGrrls contributor Andrea K. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm by Bexis
  2012 WL 876719, at *22.The court in Gross also engages in a more detailed analysis of res ipsa loquitur than we’re accustomed to seeing in preemption (or TwIqbal) opinions. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
”  Id. at *4 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:07 am by William Carleton
Tim Rowe of the Cambridge Innovation Center effectively had the last word: "If we try to legislate out failure, we're making a big mistake. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Theo Francis
Yesterday marked the deadline for big companies operating on a calendar year to file their annual reports (Form 10-K filings) with the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, in the present case, such a modification of the meaning [of the reference] would shift the domain excluded by the disclaimer, i.e. it would also modify the scope of the claim.[5.3.2] Decision T 762/90 [4.1.1] has expressed concerns against the definition of a material by a brand or trade mark (Warenzeichen) in the following way:“… the Board has reservations against the use of such a designation in a claim because it is uncertain whether the meaning of this trade… [read post]