Search for: "In Re Adoption of G."
Results 901 - 920
of 1,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Kennedy, and Joanna Breyer, the wife of Justice Stephen G. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
By adopting a more nuanced analysis, the Second Edition deprived defense counsel of a readily citable source for the proposition that low relative risks do not support inferences of specific causation. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:07 am
I start with questions about what model of leadership she should adopt (Michael Mukasey). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:49 am
After the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC adopted rules to implement this trade execution mandate. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:36 pm
You’re probably most familiar with Social Security Numbers. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:41 am
Callejon-sereni, La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme et l’imputation aux États parties des actes adoptés en vertu d’obligations internationales : entre labyrinthe méthodologique et effectivité des droits G-.F-. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
If I were dictator for a day, adopting a single standardized test for employee vs. independent contractor would be high on my to-do list. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
If your name isn’t exactly as it appears on your Social Security card, you may need a new form W-2; ask your employer if you’re not sure. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
Stewart filed a complaint and administrative appeal of his termination, alleging a violation of the Open Meetings Act under R.C. 121.22(G)(1). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
The Ninth Circuit’s reasoning suggests helpful guidance for retailers looking to avoid similar lawsuits: Adopting policies governing the placement of merchandise to maintain accessible routes, and practices and procedures to help implement those policies (g., regular walks of the store with a tape measure) do not insulate a retailer from liability if, the policies, practices, and procedures are – as in Chapman – ineffective; An obstruction is unlikely to be deemed… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
R. of Evid. 801(d)(2)(A) and (B) exempt from the hearsay rule statements made or adopted by the party-opponent. 2. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
R. of Evid. 801(d)(2)(A) and (B) exempt from the hearsay rule statements made or adopted by the party-opponent. 2. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
You’re right. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:06 pm
(g) [Record Signed More than Two Years after the Birth of the Child: Effect.] [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
CJEU’s response: Just as Member States have the discretion to decide whether or not to adopt the private copying exception into their national law, they also have the discretion to decide where the threshold lies below which prejudice or harm might be classified as “minimal” for the purposes of recital (35). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
G. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:18 am
Independent Expert, which I have re-posted here. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:50 am
As one court put it: “[G]iven the intent of SLUSA, it just makes no sense to prohibit the removal of federal securities class actions to federal court. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
It is a fact well known to certain Episcopalians—both those who have left the Episcopal Church (USA) and those who have remained—that ECUSA and its dioceses have followed a pattern of suing any church that chooses to leave for another Anglican jurisdiction. [read post]
