Search for: "J. C." Results 901 - 920 of 19,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm by admin
This document has been amended over time, and the most recent iteration can be found online at the IARC website.[3] IARC claims to build its classifications upon “consensus” evaluations, based in turn upon considerations of (a) the strength of evidence of carcinogenicity in humans, (b) the evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental (non-human) animals, and (c) the mechanistic evidence of carcinogenicity. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
On the second proceedings The FTT was entitled to determine the sum which it was reasonable for Mr Davies to pay under paragraph 33(c) of the lease, because it was a variable administration charge over which the FTT is given jurisdiction by paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 11, Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
I think I have a good handle on the settlement value of ankle fracture cases. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
C) How important is it that people are able to vote for their candidate of their choice? [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The referral in Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds, C-201/13 concerned the notion of ‘parody’. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
”Jonathan C., executive “I use LII constantly in my work. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:06 pm by Rose Hughes
PatKat will be joining Ian Jones (GJE), James St.Ville KC (8 New Square) and Sarah J. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:58 am
Under 43.5The MNF matchup between the Bills and the J..E..T..S.. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
The Government concluded then that rather than amending s.9(5)(c) of the Equality Act 2010 by order “so as to provide for an exception to a provision of this Act to apply, or not to apply, to caste or to apply, or not to apply, to caste in specified circumstances”, it preferred to proceed by the development of the existing law: “Having given careful and detailed consideration to the findings of the consultation, Government believes that the best way to provide the… [read post]