Search for: "Jonathan Ames"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
I find this development so shameful that I am including Dr. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:15 am
Ultimately, however, business is my greatest passion and I am not ready to leave the private sector. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
As far as administrative law stuff goes, it’s a great read (even if, I must confess, I am not yet convinced of the argument). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
I am also not sure that the court was correct to conclude that either the statute or the relevant regulations were “unambiguous. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 10:24 am
As a major fan-girl of Jonathan Gold’s, I carry his book in my purse. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
But I sent it into the world, it is my fault and I am mortified. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
The State, by counsel, Jonathan E. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
The dissent concludes: I am not unaware of the consequences of releasing booking photographs in the Internet Age. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
My name is Jonathan Barlow. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
My name is Jonathan Barlow. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
My name is Jonathan Barlow. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
If I am correct, then, contrary to Justice Kennedy’s assertions, there is an asymmetry in the results the Court would reach, whether the Court admits it or not.Let me close with a thought experiment that combines the last two points—about plans that tweak the criteria of admission and plans that are intended to give whites a boost. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
" But the case involves guns and statutory interpretation, so here I am writing about it.Voisine concerns 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
You can reach me directly at 770-393-4985 or by email at http://bit.ly/contact-Jonathan. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
You can reach me directly at 770-393-4985 or by email at http://bit.ly/contact-Jonathan. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 10:21 am
You can reach me directly at 770-393-4985 or by email at http://bit.ly/contact-Jonathan. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:55 pm
Jonathan Masur has persuasively argued that “any defendant who challenges a strong and worthwhile patent by infringing, and loses at trial, should be made to pay for having created a risk that the patent will be mistakenly invalidated. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 9:59 am
His decision dissenting-in-part begins: I agree with much of the majority opinion but am constrained to dissent. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
So read what follows in the context of that declaration of interest and the fact that I am bound by the terms of the injunction until trial or further order. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:40 pm
Jonathan’s Case Evaluation Based on what you write, I think you have a strong case for disability benefits. [read post]
