Search for: "Leviness v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 2,107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 1:40 pm by Brad Pauley
  [Full disclosure:  Horvitz & Levy LLP represents the petitioner, the Board of Trustees of the California State University, in this matter.] [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:46 am by Brett Burlison
Supreme Court’s opinion in Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
"* Sections 17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law, respectively, requires that the appropriate employer provide for the defense and indemnification of State and municipal officers and employees being sued for acts or omissions involving the performance of their official duties.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 11:00 pm by Benjamin Carafiol
Section 5301 of Title 38 makes VA disability benefits immune “from taxation, claims of creditors, attachment, levy and seizure. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:38 pm
The Ninth Circuit rejected OEA’s argument that prejudgment interest should not apply in the insurer-insured context, holding, under Levy-Zentner Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:24 am by Cari Rincker
However, in a 2018 case called South Dakota v. [read post]
Further information can be found here. 5                APRA proposed supervisory levy for the PHI industry for 2022-23 APRA issued a letter to the PHI industry regarding a proposed supervisory levy for 2022-23. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Lawrence Solum
Then it will discuss the history of voter access in the United States, with a focus on Harper v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:30 pm
" Kenneth Jost talks about October's big business case, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am by The Charge
  He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am by Gordon Firemark
Activision (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero) Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp Westlaw: http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8 Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]