Search for: "Little v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 24,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2013, 11:30 am
This argument gets little traction with the court. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Thus, overruling Hall would do little to help state dignity but could unfairly foreclose relief for plaintiffs like Hyatt. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
While recognizing that "there is little doubt that Rogers meant his statement to Friedlander about smoking marijuana to be confidential," the state's high court debated the definition of doctor in the law and whether a paramedic qualifies. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Interestingly, in its introduction, the Court stated: "We hold the provision is unconscionable and unenforceable under Armendariz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm
In the case of United States of America v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
We apparently don't use that term as much here in California as elsewhere, even though many many other states use it, and it also appears in CJS as well as in a wide variety of other treatises.)Regardless, the term's now been used in a California case, right? [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:15 am
Yesterday, with little fanfare, Justice Kennedy filed an statement respecting the denial of the petition for a write of certiorari in DTD Enterprises v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
His state action claim was rejected a couple of years ago. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
It makes little sense to then conclude that the unnamed class members are nevertheless bound. [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
It mirrors the “reprehensibility” factor described by the United States Supreme Court in BMW of North American, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
According to court records, the little girl was born in October 2006. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm
Appx. 562 (2014) he wrote a unanimous opinion upholding a prison regulation that requires inmates wishing to use their religious name on their mail to also use their committed name along with it.⇾In Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:44 pm
Whether an opinion of a trial court that no one reads is vacated pursuant to a settlement, by contrast, seems largely a mere formality.Justice Mallano's view that there's something like a "permanent record" for state agencies out there reminds me a little bit of parties who insist that settlement agreements include a provision that says that by settling, no party admits or denies liability. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
North Carolina adopted Whren under the state constitution in State v. [read post]
