Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 6:41 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This was stated in the Texas Supreme Court in the 2009 case, State Farm Lloyds v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:55 pm by nedaj
A recent case from the California Court of Appeals, Lloyd v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am by Don Cruse
The respondents argue that this is an extra-contractual claim that is barred by Excess Underwriters at Lloyd’s v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Justice Lloyd Karmeier filed a compelling dissent, joined by Justice Mary Jane Theis. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Allstate Texas Lloyd’s, 2012 WL 1038678 (S.D. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:28 am by Mark S. Humphreys
As stated by the United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in the 1999 case, Griggs v. [read post]