Search for: "MICHEL V. STATE" Results 901 - 920 of 1,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Takeda had sought an application stating that Mylan was infringing its patented acid-reflux drug Dexilant [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am by Lyle Denniston
The petition filed for Prince William County Clerk Michele B. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
On 14 and 15 August 2014, the PCC published two adjudications: A Woman v Kentish Gazette and A Woman v The Sun. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
The new Virginia petition by clerk Schaefer put its strongest emphasis on state sovereignty, arguing that the Supreme Court’s decision fourteen months ago in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:39 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Chicago lawyer Kenneth Dolin of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s Employer Labor Relations Blog Waiting for Claim Assignment Doesn’t Toll Statute of Limitations: American Family v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:55 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, I had the opportunity to sit down with Paul Michel, who we in the patent community know as the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
 Since 1976, notables such as Michel Foucault, Amy Gutman, Martha Nussbaum, Karl Popper, Richard Posner, John Rawls, Richard Rorty, Salmon Rushdie, Judith Shklar, Quentin Skinner, and Laurence Tribe, among others, have delivered these prestigious lectures. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm by Wystan Ackerman
State Attorney General Suits:  Christopher Curran, who argued Mississippi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
By Michelle Oxman, J.D., LL.M., Sheila Lynch-Afryl, J.D., M.A., and Danielle Capilla, J.D. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:35 am by Lisa Baird
In short, doing business in all 50 states no longer necessarily subjects a corporation to suit in all 50 states, and International Shoe v. [read post]