Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE" Results 901 - 920 of 4,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Australian federal ministers have criticised Twitters approach to banning the US President with Treasurer Josh Frydenberg stating he was uncomfortable. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
Hamilton Bank and the assertion in state court of an England v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
  The following day, although backed the Prime Minister, Mr Hancock resigned. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Nathan Cirillo, before entering Canada’s Parliament building, where Prime Minister Stephen Harper was meeting with MPs. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
In my view no president or prime minister, nor any member of the public, will think of her reputation in reduced terms as a result of it. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am by Steve Floyd
But Sudan’s support soured when Prime Minister Abiy cast the dam in more nationalistic terms. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am by Steve Floyd
But Sudan’s support soured when Prime Minister Abiy cast the dam in more nationalistic terms. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Friday 11 March the Supreme Court will hear an assessment of costs hearing in Secretary of State for Health and another v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others, on appeal from [2019] EWCA Civ 1096. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Adam Goodman
  In 2002, Prime Minister Chretien was in Vancouver for an event in Chinatown. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 Almost every publication was highly critical of Tony Blair, with each newspaper damning the former prime minister with highly negative headlines. [read post]