Search for: "Matter of Davis" Results 901 - 920 of 5,262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 8:42 pm by Steven H. Fagan, Attorney at Law
Probably one of the most common questions we get at Fagan, Fagan & Davis is "if I'm stopped for DUI in Illinois, should I take the breath test?" [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:43 pm by Glo
Duanna Davis, Cooper’s fiance, says that the tree which was knocked over in the storm was a hazard, and hand been for a long time. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:12 am by Moseley Collins
The instant matter is distinguishable from the cases discussed above and is analogous to the case of Easterby v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lee Davis
Bill Haslam has signed a bill that would allow people with handgun carry permits to store firearms in their vehicles no matter where they are parked.The signing comes despite questions about whether the legislation affects employment law in Tennessee.Senate Speaker Ron Ramsey of Blountville and four fellow Republican co-sponsors on Thursday submitted a letter for inclusion into the Senate Journal elaborating on their legislative intent for the measure.While the letter states the bill does… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by The Murray Law Firm
Should the facts of this matter reveal that the property owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on or around the premises, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their injuries. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
In my judgment the FTT was wrong to strike the application out, and I remit the matter to it for determination. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Davis v Farrell Fritz, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 00399 Decided on January 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department deals with fraud in very big numbers. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
  I don't know what would have happened in that case, but I think it's important to emphasize that excluding statements of the type involved in Davis does not mean as a general matter that the accused cannot be convicted. [read post]
Phillips makes under the free speech clause is straightforward: he feels that he expresses himself through the custom cakes he creates, and that he would be impermissibly compelled to express himself in ways he disagrees with if he were forced (by virtue of Colorado’s anti-discrimination law) to create cakes for same-sex weddings.As a doctrinal matter, his claim ostensibly implicates the First Amendment’s concern over “compelled speech. [read post]