Search for: "Matter of Steven C."
Results 901 - 920
of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2016, 11:15 am
C. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 1:13 pm
C. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:59 pm
” And then, relatedly and further, we might ask, “If Spassky and Kasparov are doubtful as to whether computers are ‘playing’ chess, is it not Dennett who must rethink the matter? [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Australian Federal Court judge Steven Rares gave a speech on the subject of “The Jury in Defamation Trials”. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
A similar showing might not be required as a First Amendment matter as to speech about matters of purely private concern. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:12 am
Steven A. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm
"She denied Cordis' motion for judgment as a matter of lawMedical Malpractice: CALIFORNIA JURY AWARDS $74.5 MILLION FOR GIRL'S BIRTH INJURIES, Blunt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Consider that in writing the Washington Post story on robots running for president, journalist Philip Bump sought comments from three lawyers: Pace Law Professor David Cassuto; Nonhuman Rights project president Steven Wise; and yours truly. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
EPA, Justice Stevens, writing for the Court and relying on the 190 [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
C. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:21 am
Besides, as a general matter isn’t it just plain silly to worry about spending a few extra million to keep the leaders at the top happy when they’re making decisions with billions at stake? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am
Stevens, 4th Dist. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Purely as a matter of retributive punishment for crimes already committed…Couey deserve(s) to be put to death. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
STEVENS, J., GINSBURG, J., and BREYER, J., filed opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:17 am
Is it a matter of public concern? [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Also important is Section 512(c)(c), referred to as the “safe harbor” provision. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Cutler & Steven S. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, at the same moment that the Court allowed Congress greater leeway in regulating economic matters previously thought reserved to the states, it abandoned the view that federal, state, or local regulation of such matters as hours, wages, and conditions of employment should be rigorously scrutinized by courts aiming to protect individual economic liberty. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade, but now that Roe has been overruled, it is difficult to see why that matters. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
" Robert C. [read post]
