Search for: "May v. IRS"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The examiner also referred to the refusal of EUTM no. 15143027 ‘TEAM SCOTLAND’, EUTM no. 17152851 ‘TEAM SERBIA’ and IR designating the IR no. 1447362 ‘TEAM UK. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
Flanagan v. duMont (Flanagan), 2016 VT 115By Elizabeth KruskaThe facts of this post-divorce action remind me of pulling on a loose thread and then everything unravels. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
He thinks it pertinent that the payment will be collected by the IRS. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Chronological order of the various duties may vary. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
Gas Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:19 am
Um de nós precisa ir” Quem disse? [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:51 pm
Here are some links that offer tips that may help:For general, all-around ideas and support on running a home office, since many solo practitioners do, visit Home Office Warrior, where you can find among other things a Home Office Warrior Blog Carnival, with a list of resources for anyone who works from home, and a look at the "Cell Phone v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587, 648, [2007]… [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:58 am
In Padilla v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
No. 48009/08), 10 May 2011, BAILII: [2011] ECHR 774, at [114]. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
He may want to help. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:40 am
It's named that for a case called Garrity v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:25 am
Essentially, if guidance is at risk of court challenge, the IRS may simply just decide not to issue it at all and wait for a taxpayer challenge. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 2:24 pm
Molinet v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:49 pm
In Lora v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 7:06 pm
From an IRS perspective, many of these may be appropriate and allowable business expenses - from a divorce accounting perspective, you may have to add back these personal expenses paid by the business to determine true income. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:39 pm
This was highlighted by the Viciano v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
IRS (D.D.C. 2021). [read post]
