Search for: "Meanes v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 69,268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
With Carpenter v. United States, Supreme Court Edges Fourth Amendment Doctrine into the 21st Century
27 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
The post With Carpenter v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
This was the subject of an interim decision of Roth J. earlier this month in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Limited and Others [2017] EWHC 2006 (Ch) (available here). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:54 am
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 1:07 am
In this post, Liz Jackson, Trainee Solicitor, and Max Wiktorsson, Associate, in the Employment Team at CMS preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Secretary of State for Business and Trade v Mercer. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
Germaine, is a term intended to have substantive meaning. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:44 pm
This means there are no providers currently offering abortions in 14 of the 15 states. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:33 pm
Spears was found guilty of conspiracy to distribute at least 50 grams of cocaine base and at least 500 grams of powder cocaine. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
The brief and a summary of its argument are available here: In 2010, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:48 am
Department of State (“DOS”) has now issued FAQs for handling of same-sex spouses in both the immigrant (green card) and nonimmigrant (temporary visa) categories, following the Supreme Court’s finding, in Windsor v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Disclosure: Prescriptive v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
When Congress says "and" they mean "and." And that likely means safety-valve relief for quite a few.
18 Jun 2021, 5:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:39 am
UNITED STATES V. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
This past June, in Ohio v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:35 am
At least since Altria v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
Board of Education was correctly decided using the original public meaning approach of Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
