Search for: "Microsoft Corp"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,345
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:14 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:05 pm
Apple Inc licensed its prized design patents to Microsoft Corp but with an “anti-cloning agreement” to prevent copying of its iPhone and iPad , an Apple executive said. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:36 pm
It's called the Domain Awareness System, and it was designed in a collaboration with NYPD detectives and Microsoft Corp. software engineers. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:36 am
Microsoft Corp., No. 11-1958 (S.D. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
Top stories today via @Mjhportland11 @dean_gonsowski # Cyprus Presidency Seeking to Achieve Partial General Approach on Certain Elements of Data Protection Reform Package … http://t.co/ZVXqRco6 # Steamboat’s Ski Corp. accidentally releases employee data http://t.co/Dz0mqwSm # Beware, Tech Abandoners. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
[6] The graphical user interface lawsuit between Apple and Microsoft in the 90s provides insight.Applied to Microsoft WindowsIn 1994, Apple sued Microsoft over the Windows user interface, which Apple claimed infringed on their GUI's original look and feel.[7] I was using a Mac at the time, and I was sure that Apple would win, even though I knew that Microsoft wasn’t the only copycat.[8] While the look and feel of… [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34, 115 (D.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:32 pm
New York police will be able to search for criminal suspects with cameras and license-plate readers through a new system developed in partnership with Microsoft Corp., the city said. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
One standard—but varying weights of evidence—to prove invalidity Last year, the Supreme Court, in Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd., [2] reaffirmed that clear and convincing evidence is the standard for proving invalidity, regardless of what happened during patent prosecution. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:20 am
[JURIST] A German court on Friday granted Microsoft Corp. an injunction against Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility [corporate websites] in a patent infringement case involving a technology [EP0618540] related to common names for long and short file allocation tables. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
Microsoft Corp., 2012-2 Trade Cases ¶77,979. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
[Readers: My last analysis (Question 197) related to post-employment restrictive covenants and the issue of whether those agreements transfer to a successor company in a merger. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
[JURIST] A German court on Thursday dismissed the patent infringement case brought by Microsoft Corp. against Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility [corporate website]. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:44 pm
Microsoft Corp., 2012-2 Trade Cases ¶77,979. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
Andrx Corp., the Federal Circuit added some needed clarity to the concept of the “presumption of validity” in patent law, and did so in a way that may be helpful to accused infringers who are arguing that the prior art (technology already disclosed in a patent or in the public domain) renders a patent invalid. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 9:16 pm
Microsoft Corp., 632 F. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:24 pm
Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, which establishes the 25% benchmark in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
