Search for: "Mines v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Supreme Court held today in Buck v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 10:22 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 404 (2000)(quoting United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am
John Morgan was a classmate of mine at the University of Florida law school. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:00 am
In a ruling by summary order, the panel concluded that none of the three sets of statements at issue constituted a material misstatement or omission (Martin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:15 pm
United StatesDocket: 10-1020Issue(s): Whether, when applied to coal that is eventually exported, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977's Abandoned Mine Land fee - which by regulation is not assessed and collected until the time of first sale, transfer, or use of the coal - violates Article I, § 9, Clause 5 of the Constitution, which provides that "[n]o Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Youngstown and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
In Bixler v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:15 am
At the time, most law schools in the country, including mine, did not offer a course on state constitutional law. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 7:38 pm
(David Bernstein) When we last encountered the Media Matters blog, its authors reacted to a George Will column on Rehabiltating Lochner by declaring that Lochner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:30 am
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Administrative Procedures Act)Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:06 am
In Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
We have been the canary in the coal mine. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm
The following article of mine was published in the December 13, 2011 edition of the Pennsylvania Law Weekly. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:54 am
USA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:32 am
The district court stated: “Because Hakim did not retract any of his arguments distinguishing the prior art, he is held to the restrictive claim construction he argued during prosecution of the patent.” (Emphasis mine). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
Since the author of that First Circuit opinion was a former professor of mine -- to whom I once turned in a exam. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:51 pm
In Dugas v. 3M Company, a man filed a lawsuit in Florida against several companies over his alleged exposure to asbestos fibers while serving in the United States Navy. [read post]
