Search for: "People v. Burnes"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
See Dworkin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am
{In Hess v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:45 pm
Like the fictitious soap operas All My Children and One Life to Live before it, the long-running real-life soap opera that was Bond v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
Andy Beshear’s statewide plan to order people into quarantine if they attend mass gatherings, including religious ones. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Cooper in his October 22, 2014 decision in Joseph M. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Case citation: Martinez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:56 am
Hannum Conviction for Cyberstalking & Revenge Porn Survives First Amendment Challenge Contacting a Person’s Facebook Friends Isn’t Stalking–People v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 1:01 am
” In Dalehite et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am
Hodges to that of Texas v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:22 am
And "Burn Notice" starts up again next week! [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 11:45 am
A jury found the Simmonses' had not burned their home, thus establishing coverage under the policy. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Sure enough, there is one other, just a floor below the Cheshire spectacle: State v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 1:23 pm
This issue is often raised in college towns (see this table), and our Supreme Court has issued a ruling on it (Dvorak v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
“We can change peoples lives. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” As the Court of Appeals opined in Capital Newspapers v Burns, 67 N.Y.2d 562, “while an agency is permitted to restrict access to those records falling within the statutory exemptions, the language of the exemption provision contains permissive rather than mandatory language, and it is within the agency's discretion to disclose such records, with or without identifying details, if it so chooses. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:52 pm
It's too good for these people. [read post]
