Search for: "Rose v. Rose"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2023, 6:12 am
After the decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:59 am
The recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:18 am
Take Kane v Honeywell Hommed, LLC, (D. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:12 am
My friend Rose Villazor is putting together an appendix for an AALS newbie conference presentation having to do with where prawfs can present works in progress. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:54 pm
Rose v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 11:54 pm
Rose v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
PatentsInternKat Rose Hughes turns her attention to the topics of claim interpretation and infringement in a recent decision by the UK Court of Appeal: Regeneron v Kymab - Part II: Interpretation and Infringement. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:43 am
Our cautionary tale comes from Miller v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:48 pm
State v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:33 am
PatentsGuestKat Léon Dijkman provided an index of some of the most interesting issues in Arnold LJ's wide-ranging FibroGen v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:05 am
While defendants also failed to timely object to plaintiffs’ legal services invoices rendered throughout 2017, defendants’ counterclaim for legal malpractice “is intertwined with . . . plaintiff law firm’s claim for legal fees,” precluding summary judgment on the claim with regard to the invoices for legal services (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]). [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:20 am
Nor is summary judgment precluded by defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim, since the record shows that plaintiff performed a great deal of work that was unrelated to the isolated malpractice claim found viable by the court (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453 [2013], lv denied 23 NY3d 904 [2014]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein v Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355, 356 [2001]). [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:27 am
Rose, 223 Neb. 49, 388 n.W.2d 101 (1986); Keefe v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:03 am
Rose v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
Judge Lohier concurred in a separate opinion; Judge Raggi concurred in part and dissented in part (Matusick v Erie County Water Authority, January 6, 2014, Sack, R). [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 4:17 pm
Meanwhile, the total compensation of Douglas Oberhelman, Caterpillar’s chief executive officer, last year rose 60% to $16.9 million. [read post]
