Search for: "Smith v. Day" Results 901 - 920 of 4,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
Piggie Park Enterprises (1968) are relevant to present-day controversies over claims to religious exemptions to antidiscrimination laws and cautioned against arguments—advanced earlier in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:42 am by Robert Ambrogi
Kent Smith, Retired Justice, Appeals Court; Moderator: R.D. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 10:08 am
They also claimed strict liability.The decision is Smith v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 10:34 am by Administrator
Devry Smith Frank LLP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
There was still no infringement or passing off so far as SCRABBLE v SCRAMBLE was concerned, however. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm
Kinney refused, and was ordered to “serve[] a one-day, in-school suspension” the following school day, according to Fox News. 4. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Paul Smith and Adav Noti
Smith is vice president of litigation and strategy and Adav Noti is senior director of trial litigation and chief of staff at the Campaign Legal Center, which filed an amicus brief in support of the states in Chiafalo v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:41 am by TOTM Admin
Smith, Stephen Weissman, Chris Wilson, Jamie France, and Connor Leydecker. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:30 am by INFORRM
  However there appears to be no flexibility in relation to the 5 day time limit for the poster’s response. [read post]