Search for: "Smith v. Director" Results 901 - 920 of 1,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Burrows v Smith (1709 Copyright Blog) (IPKat) UK MP’s frozen out of ACTA (Michael Geist) (IPKat) HMRC on the attack on image rights? [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
This week’s resolved cases include: Dolan-Powers v The Observer, Clause 1, 14/12/2012 Weston Area Health NHS Trust v Weston, Worle & Somerset Mercury, Clause 1, 10/12/2012 Lord Hunt, chair of the PCC, has appointed Lord Chris Smith (former Labour culture secretary), Simon Jenkins (former editor of the Times) and Lord Phillips (former president of the supreme court) as unpaid special advisers to help set up a new press regulator. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am by Lorene Park
After he was fired and filed suit, the director admitted he might have reacted differently if the alleged victim of harassment had been female. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
  On 11 March 2011, Smith LJ refused permission to appeal against that decision ([2011] EWCA Civ 336). [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon)   Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance)   Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Justice Jackson, who served on Harvard’s board of directors, has recused herself from the Harvard case but is expected to vote in the North Carolina case. 303 Creative v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
There will be a discussion after Smith’s presentation moderated by Darrell West. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
Legal challenges under the Convention have led to the reversal of long-standing policies on the discharge of homosexual service personnel (see Smith and Grady v UK), prompted a complete overhaul of the British military justice system to bring it into line with the requirements of the ECHR (see Findlay v UK) and set in motion the gradual extension of the European Convention’s scope of application to military operations conducted overseas (see Al-Skeini … [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The new body will be run by the director of transition, Michael McManus (appointed in February), Jonathan Collett, the director of communications and Charlotte Dewar, head of complaints, according to HoldTheFrontPage. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
Tesla neither directly nor indirectly holds equity in X, Tesla is not a director or advisor, and it does not participate in the affairs of X. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
Patrick Leahy forced former NSA director Keith Alexander to admit that the “54 attacks” claim was inaccurate in front of Congress. [read post]