Search for: "State v. Phillip"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
The circuit concluded Smith abrogated Remmer in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Doe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:45 pm
In Nunes v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
§ 14-2-309(a)(v).II. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:52 pm
The baker, Jack Phillips, contends that the law violates the First Amendment by requiring Phillips to create custom wedding cakes for same-sex weddings, in violation of his sincerely held religious beliefs. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 2:01 pm
§ 42.100(b) (2016); see also Phillips v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:20 am
: In Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:43 am
This year, the gathering of industry compliance and legal professionals heard the usual updates on CFTC enforcement actions and NFA regulatory matters, but also had the opportunity to learn about the intersection of antitrust and derivatives law, ethical issues implicated in regulatory investigations, and lessons on aggressive courtroom tactics from a lawyer who took on the DOJ in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:15 am
=@Phillips , 515 F.3d at 235; see alsoWilkerson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
These activities as remarked in Phillips v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
With respect to the first counterclaim, defendants submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of their services (see generally Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon v Chu, 240 AD2d 231, 659 N.Y.S.2d 4), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to defendants' entitlement to the fees sought (see generally DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335, 664 N.Y.S.2d 537; [**3] Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613, 614… [read post]
22 May 2015, 12:26 pm
They include: (1) Nonnon v City of New York;2 (2) Simpson v City of New York;3 (3) Irizarry v City of New York;4 (4) Carollo v City of New York;5 (5) Walsh v City of New York;6 (6) Arisio v City of New York;7 (7) Parmigiano v City of New York;8 (8) Phillips v City of New York;9 and (9) Nessen v City of New York.10 There were 29 plaintiffs in the original nine actions. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
