Search for: "State v. Register" Results 901 - 920 of 13,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2013, 12:22 am by Mark Summerfield
This state of affairs creates potential difficulties for a party with financial limitations, once a court action has commenced. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by John Jascob
The defendants failed to register the offering and deprived investors of the information that would be contained in a registration statement.Like the SEC, the New York Attorney General also brought a claim for registration violations, in the state’s case under the Martin Act. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 1:49 am
LONG, be, and is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland effective immediately; and it is further,ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Dimone G. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:49 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Aktas v Adepta (A Registered Charity) [2010] EWCA Civ 1170 (22 October 2010) Wilkinson & The Estate of Brian Wilkinson v Farmer [2010] EWCA Civ 1148 (22 October 2010) Law Debenture Trust Corporation Plc v Elektrim SA & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1142 (22 October 2010) Oakes, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1169 (22 October 2010) Dry, R (on the application… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:47 pm by zshapiro
The question before the Supreme Court this week in Reynolds v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  The issue is whether the youth’s duty to remain registered as a sex offender under state law depended upon whether he was obliged to be registered under federal law, or whether the duty to register under state law had its own independent force. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
The area was considered by the First Tier Tribunal in Reactiv Media Limited v The Information Commissioner (Privacy & Electronic Communications Regulations  (2003) [2015] UKFTT 2014_0213 (GRC). [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by JOHN VASSILLOU, MCGILL & CO
  Ms Romein’s claim was however rejected by the Secretary of State on the basis that her birth had not been registered at a consulate within a year of her birth. [read post]