Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer" Results 901 - 920 of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
That's important, but it doesn't put food on the table and there have to be other people who are doing that. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:47 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Breyer makes the point that a brief which is well below the Court's page limit conveys the author’s confidence in his argument: "he thinks he's really got the law on his side because he only took up 30. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:31 am by Steve Hall
  "Racial mix of jury pool criticized," is Anne Blythe's report in today's News & Observer. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Kwall, citing Naomi Mezey,[6]significantly observes that the Supreme Courts decision rested in part on the fact that the Miranda warnings have become a vital part of American culture and have accordingly acquired the status of “constitutional law” in that way, because Americans view them as such. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:50 am
He did not get a warrant to do so. . . .During his search of Wilson's smartphone, Officer Nyren observed text messages exchanged between Wilson and Ryan Tentoni. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
In the wake of the Supreme Court's Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That's inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of the one Supreme Court case that construes Section 4, Perry v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
On Monday, the Supreme Court surprised only the most optimistic of folks and reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision disqualifying Donald J. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
There's a lot to talk about but this post focuses on one significant point: this was the year originalism became a four-letter word. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
Supreme Court has said that a police officer may follow people along the public streets (by foot or in a vehicle) without compromising anyone's reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 38 AD3d 294, 295 [2007]).Back in New York Supreme, Grand Medical renewed its motion for summary judgment, arguing that Country-Wide's nurse's peer review was legally insufficient because it did not set forth the reviewer's "training, observations and actual experience", as required by the First Department in its Channel Chiropractic decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
While I could see reasons for Samsung and its allies (such as Google) to push for Supreme Court clarification of one or more key issues, there's no reason why Samsung couldn't or shouldn't simply do a deal with Apple that makes business sense.My primary concern about the prospects for a settlement at this stage is that, in my observation, Apple has become self-righteous beyond imagination and potentially even a bit too… [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:56 pm
Out of Order: Stories from the History of the Supreme Court by Sandra Day O'Connor (2013)45. [read post]
13 Apr 2025, 10:44 am by Mark Tushnet
Yet I also don't believe that any judge, even one who deep down might share that view, would actually hold that the use was in bad faith (much less that two court of appeals judges would, much less that five Supreme Court justices would). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Let me make a broader observation: the judges in this string cite should populate any future list of Supreme Court nominees. [read post]