Search for: "Toy v. Toy"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2017, 5:02 pm
(vi) Toys. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:51 am
After U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:34 pm
A recent Trademark Trial and Appeals Board opinion in Central Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:20 am
Tyrrell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:04 am
Toys `R’ Us, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
” Kenner Parker Toys, 963 F.2d at 353; Nina Ricci, S.A.R.L. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
Lead Co., Ltd., Opposition No. 91150248 [Opposition to registration of the mark TEENIE WEENIE BEAR & Design in classes 16 and 25, on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with the design of Opposer's "Paddington Bear" for stuffed toys].March 31, 2009 - 11 AM: Pleasant Travel Service v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
The General Court gave its decision today in a Community trade mark appeal, Case T-369/10 You-Q BV v OHIM. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:58 am
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 12:24 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
The Court accepted Wiley’s argument that the assignments were a “sham,” and noted that the Second Circuit rejected the exact same argument DRK advances in” Eden Toys, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm
The pessimist enters a room full of toys and sits there wailing disconsolately, saying, “Something is going to break. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
Image from hereAs TOI reports, Amit Mehra’s ‘Zanjeer 2.0’ starring Ram Charan and Priyanka Chopra is now before the Bombay HC. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:32 pm
Laetitia Lagarde on Class 46 reports on a Community trade mark spat between two Alexes, in which the General Court confirmed what this Kat had always believed -- that "children's bath toys" and "sporting articles" were neither the same nor similar goods. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:06 am
" Zuru LLC and Zuru Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S is another of those intellectual property cases that hits the headlines on account of its subject matter rather than because of its intrinsic legal interest -- though it is by no means lacking in legal interest. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:11 am
DocName=073000050HCh%2E+V&ActID=1999&ChapterID=55&SeqStart=23500000&SeqEnd=40900000Read More [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:58 am
Finally, relying on Matal v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:09 am
Corral v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:12 am
Washington State Attorney General Press Release State of Washington v. [read post]