Search for: "USA v. Majors" Results 901 - 920 of 1,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2007, 11:00 pm
Quite right, said the CFI, dismissing Intervideo's appeal - CFI decision in Case T-105/06 Intervideo v OHIM, (IPKat)EPO adds EPC post-grant data to PRS database (EPO), EU Patent Jurisdiction: Details of New Proposals From Portuguese EU Presidency (Blog@IPR::JUR), (IAM), Teva invalidates acid metabolite patents for terfenedine, (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and another v Merrell Pharmaceuticals Inc, Aventis and Sepracor [2007] EWHC 2276 (Ch) ), (IPKat), Nice summary of… [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Atlantic, Eric Posner weighs in on Monday’s decision in Apple v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 11:07 pm
[Note: This post is Part V of a series on amending the BCP and adopting trial or experimental liturgies for use in the Church, as we head into General Convention LXXVII later this week. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Christie v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Specifically, I believe that the majority's resolution of Filter's challenge to the Commission's recognition of local law, while reaching the correct result, is problematic.In The State Group Industrial (USA) Unlimited v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
PLIVA USA, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 292700 (4th Cir. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
City of Roswell – the duty of a local government to spell out the reasons for denying a permit for a cellphone tower M&G Polymers USA v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  Having a major facility in the jurisdiction, and acquisition of a major in-state operating subsidiary, along with “significant” revenue wasn’t enough for the defendant to be “at home. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:07 am by Amy Howe
And if so, who is the majority anyway? [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) (4 justice majority of 7-justice court). [read post]