Search for: "United States Court of Federal Claims et al" Results 901 - 920 of 2,528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The International Trademark Association (INTA) has filed an Amicus Brief (here) in support of the petition for writ of certiorari seeking Supreme Court review of the Fourth Circuit's FLANAX decision, Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG, et al., 819 F.3d 697 (4th Cir. 2016) (4th Cir. 2016). [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
While there are statutory exceptions that vary slightly from state to state, generally the government is shielded from legal action in the event that one of its representatives is found liable in a claim. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
International Trade Commission, et al., No. 16-428 (Whether Section 337(a)(1)(A) permits the ITC to adjudicate claims regarding trade secret misappropriation alleged to have occurred outside the United States.) [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Steve Baird
As the Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently noted in Bruce Munro and Bruce Munro Studio v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
§318(b) violates Article III of the United States Constitution, to the extent that it empowers an executive agency tribunal to assert judicial power canceling private property rights amongst private parties embroiled in a private federal dispute of a type known in the common law courts of 1789, rather than merely issue an advisory opinion as an adjunct to a trial court. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm by Schachtman
The federal rules of evidence and most state evidence codes require more. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
Krob The United State Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has provided clarity this week regarding the patent eligibility of computerized processes. [read post]