Search for: "United States v. Anthony May" Results 901 - 920 of 1,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
United States Georgia’s Supreme Court has ruled against a woman who claimed she was stalked online. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   It did not do so, for example, in its most recent ruling in a major gay rights case — the 2013 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Press Oct., 2013) Katrina Kimport, Queering Marriage: Challenging Family Formation in the United States (Rutgers U. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 pm by Amy Howe
For example, there is a presumption that U.S. law does not apply outside the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the local government in Town of Greece v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]