Search for: "United States v. Wright" Results 901 - 920 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
United States[13], the district court refused to enforce plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena that sought documents from defendant’s expert witness. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
This is part of a growing generation of cases involving governments in Canada and the United States prosecuting individuals for the contents of the comics that they’re reading. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am by Emma Snell
  Attorney General Merrick Garland has threatened to sue states that have outlawed or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In addition to his many important decisions, Story’s three-volume Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States was and remains extremely influential.Neither Marshall nor Story is an uncomplicated hero, however. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am by Colin Miller
According to the opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Lees v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Dissenting from that approach, then-Commissioner Joshua Wright stated that the FTC’s findings on a range of issues related to IoT security were made on the basis of general suspicions rather than on economic and empirical analysis, and that it may have been better to wait to see how some of the issues will actually evolve in the marketplace before acting. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Tony Wright reading Actual Innocence by Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by SHG
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]