Search for: "Utah v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 1,567
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
RossCase number: 13-cv-00188 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: March 14, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 6, 2013 10/22/2013 01/20/2014 2013-100 In the Matter of TD Bank, N.A.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 8:59 am by Eric P. Robinson
  In the United States, the Supreme Court has held that government may not enact taxes or other financial measures that specifically aimed at shutting shown speech (see, e.g., Grosjean v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am by Bexis
One aspect of the ACA is the envisioned effect of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (here’s the USPSTF’s website) role in evaluating screening methods. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:49 am by Steven Gursten
  State Farm has supposedly created units and is investigating these law firms. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
WoodCase number: 11-cv-00357 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: April 18, 2011Qualifying judgment/order: July 6, 2012 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-75 In the Matter of A.R. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
In a case of first impression the United States Court of Appeals has ruled that claims for punitive damages are justiciable under Pennsylvania Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act 12 Pa. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm by Theodore Ruger
 Other states, like Utah, have chosen to press ahead with their own exchanges but under a much more explicitly market-based paradigm than the baseline contemplated by HHS. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm by Jeff Gittins
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
The court noted that ‘the near-universal and firmly established common-law rule in the United States flatly prohibited the admission of juror testimony to impeach a jury verdict. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
The Role of the Jury in Criminal Trials Juries have played a central role in trials at least as far back as the Thirteenth Century, and were solidly part of the English system at the time of the founding of the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
June 27, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the tolling rule established by the United States Supreme Court in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]