Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 901 - 920 of 2,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Co. v Brenner, 41 NY2d 291, said that "an employee is to be loyal to his [or her] employer and is 'prohibited from acting in any manner inconsistent with his [or her] agency or trust and is at all times bound to exercise the utmost good faith and loyalty in the performance of his [or her] duties.'" In the words of the Appellate Division, “[u]nder what is commonly referred to as the faithless servant doctrine, ‘[o]ne who owes a duty of… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Forty-one days after Gene's lecture, CAAF would issue its opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
Tweedy, “Unjustifiable Expectations:  Laying to Rest Allotment-Era Settlers,” 36 Seattle U. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am by Leandra Lederman
A more recent example of a Tax Court violation of judicial norms was revealed by Ballard v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am by Andrew Pincus
In other words, the U.S. government’s legal position, if accepted by the Supreme Court, will hurt the U.S. economy. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:22 pm
The canon against superfluity assists only where a competing interpretation gives effect " 'to every clause and word of a statute.' " Duncan v. [read post]