Search for: "ANDREW DOE" Results 9181 - 9200 of 9,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
9:00 a.m. sesstion:  Culture, Tradition and Language in Cross-Border Negotiations and International Conflict presented by Professor John Barkai, University of Hawaii; Andrew Aglionby, Baker & McKenzie; and, Michael Zacharia, Former Exec. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:18 am by Steven Berk
” The technical jargon and size of the report are daunting, but readers willing to wade through it learn that consumers are ingesting uncontrolled amounts of fluorides through their water supply without our scientists knowing what this does to our brains. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am by Jasmine Joseph
An uneasy standoff exists between the constitutional antidiscrimination standard, which requires proof of discriminatory intent, and the statutory antidiscrimination standard, which does not. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The disposal hearing followed an order by Sir Andrew Nicol, dated 22 October 2021 striking out the defence filed by each defendant and ordering judgement for the claimant. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 10382-22 Mitchell v The Sentinel, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Satisfactory Remedy – 10512-22 Bavister v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 01732-22 Rahman v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 00627-22 Doe v You (The Mail on Sunday), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation… [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The other two witnesses were Professor Dan Burk (UC Irvine) and Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown, representing BSA). [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The heightened pace of securities class action lawsuit filings continued in 2018, as filing levels remained well above historical patterns, even though the total number of suits dipped very slightly compared to 2017. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
If the editors of the NEJM who published this article think that this is science, then we should not be surprised if they nominate Andrew Wakefield for the Nobel Prize in Medicine.The Special Report then provides some familiar anecdotes of the difficulties of being a whistleblower. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Securities Law Prof Blog: 60 Minutes ran a piece last night on members of Congress who may have used confidential information obtained through their positions to make profitable stock trades. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Michael Froomkin
But suppose he does win. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:11 pm by Kenneth Anderson
— I think you were in that seminar with me, along with Sharon Lloyd and Andrew Hsu  - does this ring any bells?) [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 10:11 am by Wells Bennett
The government does not object to his qualification as an expert in bioethics and medicine—and he is quickly deemed to be one. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Both permissive and restrictive regimes exist across all three categories; the existence of some sort of property tax cap does not necessarily impose an effective restraint on property tax increases. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the People’… [read post]