Search for: "In Re L."
Results 9181 - 9200
of 22,401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2021, 11:22 am
The two blow-ups not at issue here are l’affaire Bygmalion and l’affaire Gadaffi. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:00 am
We’re seeing that, unlike even as little as a couple of years ago, when 27% of L&D pros said that they had a limited budget at the top challenge. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:09 pm
OVERTURNED BY: In Re Bose Corp., Opp. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
AFSCME plans to re-file a "say on pay" resolution at Countrywide that seeks an annual investor vote on pay practices. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
See Herbko Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:04 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:09 pm
They’re still fairly new, so the rules aren’t all that familiar to many taxpayers. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
You're outta here!] [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 11:43 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Non-FictionClearing in the forest : law, life, and mind, by Steven L. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
In 2019 and beyond, you’ll want to look for the six things listed below when you’re considering job candidates. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:08 pm
In KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" (slip op., pp. 19-20).Thus if one decided to check out the DRUMLINE LIVE show thinking it included percussionists and then, upon arriving at the show learned that it did not, the mark would arguably still be deceptively misdescriptive of or deceptive for the services on a sort-of "initial interest confusion" theory.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:35 am
On Monday, August 3rd, the White House withdrew its (re)nomination of FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly for another term. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 3:52 am
With New York City on the cusp of cutting $1 billion from the Police Department, a city councilwoman, Vanessa L. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Int’l Ins. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:43 am
L. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:11 am
In re UDOR U.S.A., Inc., 89 USPQ2d 1978 (TTAB 2009) [precedential].Functionality: As usual, the Board applied the CCPA's four-factor analysis set forth in In re Morton-Norwich Prods., Inc., 213 USPQ 9, 15-16 (CCPA 1982), which requires the Board to consider (1) whether a utility patent discloses the utilitarian advantages of the design; (2) whether advertising materials tout the design's utilitarian advantages; (3) the availability of functionally-equivalent alternatives;… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:42 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
