Search for: "Matter of Goods" Results 9181 - 9200 of 95,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2021, 3:55 am by SHG
Joe Biden probably does, not that it’s the sort of thing he wants to talk about, and with good reason. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:18 am
  The first exclusion barred coverage for “loss or damage, costs, attorney’s fees or expenses which arise by reason of . . . (3) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters . . . [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Valerie Katz
They are great referral sources.Do good work (obviously). [read post]
18 May 2011, 4:18 pm by Garry Fujita
The reason why the change occurred does not really matter but now you know that you are liable for sales tax on food. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:51 am by Andrew S. Williams, Esq.
It is important to have good service providers but it also is important to understand those plan responsibilities that are not delegated to service providers. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
It's a good week for sorting out confidentiality cases. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:03 am
These are good and important questions. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 5:35 pm
  This book full disclosure: the new lawyer's must-read career guide is just not good. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:30 am by Bill Bratton
Bill Bratton I love really good contrarian papers. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:35 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
  Blogging is good for a lot of reasons. [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
The average consumer would understand the word ORIGIN as referring to the origin of the goods, whether this meant their geographical origin or their trade origin. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm by Aparajita Lath
In the case of De Beers Abrasive, it was held - "the law is that any trader is entitled to puff his own goods even though such puff as a matter of pure logic involves the denigration of his rival’s goods. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:49 am by Florian Mueller
It also cites a Fourth Circuit decision distinguishing between an objective prong and a subjective prong of "good faith". [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:29 pm by Thomas Key
" The Court noted that the USPTO was wrong to rely upon Goodyear to assert that generic company terms (including ".com") are "ineligible for trademark protection as a matter of law" regardless of consumer impression. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:08 am by Tian Lu
 To that, the Court noted that what matters in determining the scope of a trade mark’s protection is the usual meaning of the term, not the taxonomic information structure: ... the classification of goods and services under the Nice Agreement is itself carried out only for exclusively administrative purposes. [read post]