Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 9181 - 9200
of 9,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
"Rea, DJ, granted Gov't motion in limine barring necessity defense, Nuremberg Principles, motive evidence, int'l law. 11/16/87: Jury convicted Def of destroying Gov't property. 1/11/88: DJ sentenced: 5 yrs prison; $500,000 restitution to come from book, movie deals; denied bail. 5/10/89: 9th Cir aff'd. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 1:20 pm
-Joseph L. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 3:58 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Q. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
City of Los Angeles Dep’t of Water and Power v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
There are very limited exceptions which won’t apply in most cases). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
L. 331 (2006-2007). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
"[T]he phrase 'no legitimate purpose' means the absence of a reason or justification to engage someone, other than to hound, frighten, intimidate or threaten" (People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
See Knake Jefferson at 34 (citing State ex rel, Okla Bar Ass’n v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
CLS Bank Int’l. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
APPEALS TO: Rissie L. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:29 am
R. 38 T. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:59 am
http://t.co/aep7bawL4a -> TripAdvisor’s “Dirtiest Hotels” List Isn’t Defamatory—Seaton v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:30 am
On August 2, a federal judge in Iowa ordered the EEOC to pay $4.69 million in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by trucking giant CRST in defending against the agency’s sweeping sexual harassment suit, due in part to the agency’s failure to investigate, issue a reasonable cause determination, and conciliate the claims of a number of putative class members (EEOC v CRST Van Expedited, Inc, August 1, 2013, Reade, L). [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
