Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 9181 - 9200
of 15,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit… [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
In Hatfield v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 11:18 am
Sanchez v TIC Ins. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am
HTC resorts to failure-of-proof and failure-to-state-actionable-claim types of arguments, which are irrelevant for now because the leading German reference on patent litigation clearly says that all a plaintiff needs to do here to state an actionable claim is to allege that a specified patent claim is infringed by certain accused products. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:05 pm
I've seen comments on Internet discussion boards according to which the long-running Oracle v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:28 am
Posted by David UrbanIn Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
Archer claims that his novel Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less was turned into the 2011 romantic comedy hit Ladies v Ricky Bahl, and that Archer's Kane & Abel became the film Khudgarz. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
”The Village's counsel replied indicating that: the proposed settlement did not violate employees' free speech rights; the settlement was advantageous for employees §18; and refusal would be patently unreasonable and a breach of their duty to cooperate under the Public Officers Law** and Village Code.The employees refused to settle. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:42 am
Which is why, in Nasrallah v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:42 am
Which is why, in Nasrallah v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:49 pm
What the Court said at 248 N.Y. page 72 at 161 N.E. page 423 of Raymond v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:46 am
At a minimum, the vigorous dissent in the Loral case shows that judicial views on this issue are hardly uniform, and in view of the close vote in the case at the intermediate appellate level, the state of the law on these issues arguably is not settled. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:46 pm
That debate won’t get settled anytime soon. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:34 am
I am aware of one recent case, Greer-Burger v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
(relisted after the Dec. 4, Dec. 11, Jan. 8, Jan. 15 and Jan. 22 conferences) [NB: the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle and the court now appears to be holding the case] Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:41 pm
Clark v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 3:24 pm
Strong local, state, and federal lien laws embolden hospitals to drive a hard bargain. [read post]
